Reina Roja + Shahrazad · NetrunnerDB

Legality (show more)
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest)
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active)
Standard Ban List 23.03
Standard Ban List 22.09
Standard Ban List 22.08
Standard Ban List 21.10
Standard Ban List 21.10
Standard Ban List 21.06
Standard Ban List 21.06
Standard Ban List 21.05
Standard Ban List 21.04
Standard Ban List 20.09
Standard Ban List 20.06
Standard MWL 3.4b
Standard MWL 3.4
Standard MWL 3.3
Standard MWL 3.2
Standard MWL 3.1
Standard MWL 3.0
NAPD MWL 2.2
NAPD MWL 2.1
NAPD MWL 2.0
NAPD MWL 1.2
NAPD MWL 1.1
NAPD MWL 1.0

Rotation
Pre-rotation decklist

Packs
Core Set
What Lies Ahead
Trace Amount
A Study in Static
Humanity's Shadow
Future Proof
Creation and Control
Opening Moves
Second Thoughts
Mala Tempora

Card draw simulator
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more

Repartition by Cost

Repartition by Strength

Derived from
None. Self-made deck here.

Inspiration for
None yet

Include in your page (help)

Mash 32

Disrupter is a proxy for Shahrazad.

This is a theorical deck mixing Caïssa programs, Rezzing denials and odd credit engine with Shahrazad hosting Caïssa a few nanoseconds before jumping on ICEs with Deep Red

2 comments
31 Oct 2013 nbove Interesting deck. Seems solid. A few small suggestions and reasoning. Consider Crypsis over Darwin. I have found Darwin to be generally inferior to Crypsis unless you have a lot of support for him (Personal Touch, E3, Cyberfeeder). Since you are tight on cards and influence it seems like Crypsis would be a generally better card since he requires no support other than lots of money, which you have. Finally, 3x parasite with 0x datasucker seems very slow. Perhaps try to find room for some suckers to deal with problem ice.
8 Nov 2013 Mash Those are good points and I cant refute them as long as I didnt test it, but, in theory at least, Bishop is meant to be an enabler for Darwin, a sudden one-shot trash for Parasite, but reusable thanks to Pawn, and Surge is there to surprise the corp again after the Bishop trick. Still you're probably right about Crypsis because few Ices will be rezzed anyway, so few counters would be needed, I thougth of Darwin because the Ices that will be rezzed won't be costly either. I would have played both with Djinn to tutor them, but that's one of the problem of Caïssa for now : only a console to help with the MU and no way to tutor or recycle them like Djinn or Déjà vu for the virus, thus the heavy Shaper influence.

2 comments

31 Oct 2013 nbove

Interesting deck. Seems solid. A few small suggestions and reasoning. Consider Crypsis over Darwin. I have found Darwin to be generally inferior to Crypsis unless you have a lot of support for him (Personal Touch, E3, Cyberfeeder). Since you are tight on cards and influence it seems like Crypsis would be a generally better card since he requires no support other than lots of money, which you have. Finally, 3x parasite with 0x datasucker seems very slow. Perhaps try to find room for some suckers to deal with problem ice.

8 Nov 2013 Mash

Those are good points and I cant refute them as long as I didnt test it, but, in theory at least, Bishop is meant to be an enabler for Darwin, a sudden one-shot trash for Parasite, but reusable thanks to Pawn, and Surge is there to surprise the corp again after the Bishop trick.

Still you're probably right about Crypsis because few Ices will be rezzed anyway, so few counters would be needed, I thougth of Darwin because the Ices that will be rezzed won't be costly either.

I would have played both with Djinn to tutor them, but that's one of the problem of Caïssa for now : only a console to help with the MU and no way to tutor or recycle them like Djinn or Déjà vu for the virus, thus the heavy Shaper influence.