Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Packs |
---|
Core Set |
What Lies Ahead |
Trace Amount |
A Study in Static |
Humanity's Shadow |
Future Proof |
Creation and Control |
Opening Moves |
Second Thoughts |
Mala Tempora |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from |
---|
None. Self-made deck here. |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
Reina Roja's Cojones Busting. | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
A Credit Denial deck for Reina Roja, with extensive Caissa usage and support by Parasucker and Darwin. Caissa are not autonomous in runs, and I have to get confident with the tactic before being able to free some slots from overabundant breakers. First deck of this kind for me, came up with that in about 30 minutes and imediately after rebuilding once again my Rielle deck, so please don't be cruel, comments welcome.
3 comments |
---|
10 Dec 2013
PeekaySK
|
10 Dec 2013
PeekaySK
...and if you look at the paragraph where I recommend to both keep and ditch the Bishops, you'll see what I meant about unsorted comments :P Since I can't edit the comment, I'll try to explain what I meant: "In this current form, Bishop should be cut. If you feel like re-thinking your icebreaker approach, Bishop should probably stay and Knight should go". |
Unsorted comments, as they pop into my head:
I feel that the plan to siphon and/or extensively vamp sorta clashes with Xanadu, as you don't want to be stuck holding spares for when the corp trashes it. If you want to keep both, I'd probably try to fit in Crash Space somehow, to dump the tags dirt cheap.
I have somewhat mixed feelings on FAO, personally. Most of the time, it'll be used to nuke a piece of unrezzed ice - so, basically, to get you into places safer. I'd much rather facecheck (which is pretty safe if you get Mimic, or have Knight moved into position. If you really want to nuke unrezzed ice, that's what Kraken is for, isn't it? :D
With this many Caissa and a ton of support programs, you desperately need a third Deep Red, and posibly even a Mem Chip (at the very least, you'll need Darwin, one Knight, One or two Rooks, One or two Datasuckers and a Parasite... and that's before using any optional stuff like Bishop and Crescentus).
Also, you have way of accessing more than 1 card at a time - no Medium, no Nerve Agent, no Interfaces. I feel like Medium goes particularly well with what you're going for here, as it'll be hard to have any relevant ICE on archives, so you should be able to rack up Medium counters at a crazy pace. One card you could consider then (but probably won't have place for) is Demo Run - basically, it will win you games you would have won anyway, but much much faster.
The one card I would probably cut completely is Bishop - I can sorta see why it's there (for Darwin), but due to its anti-synergy with Knight it feels kinda meh. I'd say either drop the Knights, or drop the Bishops. Personally, I'd keep the Bishops, because Knights have to be moved into position before the run to be able to break anything, leaving much more room for corp counterplay with regards to which ICE they rez. Bishop, on the other hand, is mostly a way to save some Datasucker counters in places you can't reach comfortably.
Not sure you have the econ to sustain repeated Vamping, to be honest. Personally, I'd try to go the 3x Crescentus route, to force repeated rezzes instead. Same effect, but much cheaper for you in the end. You can drop one Clone Chip for the 2 Crescentus(es), as they're the program you'll be cloning the most (next to Parasite).
One thing I would try to fit in here would be 3x Compromised Employee, but it's probably too card-slot intensive to really work in here.