Pitch black v1.0 - Chronos Protocol Reggio Emilia (IT) 1st P

Why no Prepaid VoicePAD? And how's the 'too many breakers' + Freelance doing for you?

Seems like you'd have to draw your entire deck before you wanted to play a full Freelance Coding Contract.

I helped Aldaris playtest this deck for the Chronos Protocol, and used the deck myself a few times as well.

Prepaid VoicePAD might work in the deck, but there's also a few economy cards that already cost 0 credits, and no event recursion, so you can live without.

Freelance Coding Contract here works as a late game economy card, and given in costs 0, even trashing just 2-3 programs is quite a good income ration for one click. You don't need to have drawn all your deck, but if, for example, you're in a game where Force of Nature and/or Deus Ex are not needed, you just trash them for credits... same if you draw too many Corroders or other IBs.

I wasn't exactly convinced myself with this card, but during playtest we found it works quite well, and it's actually a great help in late game situations.

it's not easy to play with this deck. it isn't a combo deck or a recursion deck is a simple skill deck, there isn't a best strategy. i have never play two times the same game. i play wildside against jinteki but not against nbn, for example. you have to read your opponent game and anticipate his intentions.

i think it's a good deck instead. I think there are many choice to do playing, and read the game of the opponent it's a true condition to win. I have not played this deck but i will ! Good choice Aldaris ! Dydra have you played it ?

YOU can't see but i can see the direction of this deck, and maybe you have to consider that this deck is a good solution for anarch and whizzard because this deck won a chronos protocol. combo in netrunner is a different concept, indexing and then TME for me is a combo. maybe to win with anarch you have to think different. recursion, tutor great resource economy are good for criminal and shaper but maybe not for anarch because they don't have good recursion and good resource economy and no tutor.

Interesting deck, but it feels a bit like two different ideas stuck together. With all the redundancy in the breakers and Special Order, it looks like 'rig up and roll out', but then there's no multi-access to make it threatening. Then you've got the self-tagging and DLR, a trick I'm personally fond of, but you've got Wyldside and six of your money generators are doubles. DLR is a click-intensive strategy, and Joshua B can only go so far towards mitigating that.

I'd either go for one or the other, but perhaps that's a personal preference. I'll give it a shot before I judge it too harshly. Oh also, any particular reason for Whizzard? I can't see what he adds over Reina

@Dydra: Yes, his corp deck went undefeated at the tournament. He's also posted it.

And here I was, thinking that in Android: Netrunner it's the player who makes the difference, not the deck. One gets hardly carried to victory by his deck.

I prefer whyzzard only for the 3credits. Against HB, nbn Fa and jinteki RP is better to the other anarch identity. This deck is built to have solution against the differents corporation. We can call it a morph skill deck.

Masanori is one of my draw engine. I don't use DLR all the game is only my plan b when i need to force the corp. Can we call you an arrogant person?

This deck is not a guide to play properly whizzard. If you are envying about this anarchici result don't bore US with your whinig. This deck don't work for you but probably se have different ways to approach netrunner. Your approach is not better then mine and vice versa. I'm not in war against you but probably you should ne more modest. You don't have the truth.

Oh great anarch and jinteky master tell me how to play properly this two factions. Man indexing and Tme is a combo cause if you have these card you will use them. Dlr and Joshua b no. I repeat if you don't like this deck shut up if you don't have constructive critics.

@Dydra, you're not adding anything to this discussion. "I don't see this working" isn't a useful criticism, especially when it's a deck that has seen use and has worked. This seems like a swiss army deck-- it has a lot of stuff that you might or might not use, depending on how you feel about the gamestate and your opponent. It also feels like it responds to the circumstances of one particular meta. Why are you so bent out of shape about it?