Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Thanks for the v2 feedback all! I was able to revise my deck in a way that feels much more effective due to your advice.
The economy feels a little more robust. I was able to pare down my breakers, max out my ProCos, reinstate Sure Gamble, and integrate other suggested cards to increase my deck functionality (Amped Up, Hostage). I can't believe I've never been aware of SMC before, that probably reveals my limited casual play experience... which I am hoping to change.
Feedback for this version is greatly appreciated. One specific question I had in mind involved my doubling of Laamb. Is this a good number of breakers, or would I be better suited to have only one Laamb and include a contact resource as my 45th?
3 comments |
---|
6 Apr 2019
rubyvr00m
|
13 Apr 2019
merryartist
That's a great idea, I totally forgot about tags. What about Misdirection? Since its a program I could snag it with SMC, but I'd have to limit to one copy and replace Laamb, go over the 45 minimum, or remove other cards. The other ones I could think of are New Angeles City Hall or Qianju PT. |
14 Apr 2019
merryartist
Or would tag avoidance only count in protecting Beckman, since receiving one trashes her? In that case it would be Qianju PT or New Angeles City Hall? |
This version looks like it has improved a lot over previous iterations.
I think since you don't run a lot of recursion cards like Clone Chip you are probably fine with the second copy of Laamb. That gives you an extra copy in case you lose it to a Trash Program subroutine or stealing a new agenda like SDS Drone Deployment (which costs a program to steal).
The one thing I would consider adding to this version is something that lets you prevent a tag like Forger. This gives you an emergency out to not lose Rachel Beckman (say if you run through a Data Raven). Otherwise I think this looks pretty solid.