Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
The Divergent Series: Allegiant The cast of "The Divergent Series: Allegiant," (pictured left to right) Ansel Elgort, Naomi Watts, Theo James, Shailene Woodley, and Nadia Hilker attend the New York premiere on March 14, 2016 in New York City. "Allegiant" will probably not break any records at the box office. Photo: Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images
The franchise is called "Divergent," but do not expect the latest installment to veer into uncharted territory at the box office. "The Divergent Series: Allegiant," which premieres Friday, is the third film of an underperforming franchise that continues to toil in the shadow of other young adult giants.
"The Divergent Series: Allegiant," stars Shailene Woodley and Theo James as two young soldiers continuing their battle against an oppressive society that divides the population into five virtuous factions and hopes to eradicate those deemed "divergent" that do not fit in those boxes. The franchise, an adaptation of the popular young adult novel series of the same name by Veronica Roth, premiered in 2014 with "Divergent."
"Divergent" hit theaters as a slew of young adult film adaptations were launched, including "The Maze Runner" and "Percy Jackson & The Olympians," that, while profitable, failed to live up to the success of their big name predecessors, "The Hunger Games" and "Twilight." "Divergent" grossed just under $151 million domestically, while its 2015 follow-up, "The Divergent Series: Insurgent," fell to just over 130 million, according to Box Office Mojo. With global revenue added in, the movies more than exceed their budget costs to bring a profit to studio Lionsgate — a fourth and final film is still in the works. However, they certainly never reached the level of popularity necessary to become a cultural sensation.
"The Hunger Games," also produced by Lionsgate, fared much better. The first "Hunger Games" film earned over $408 million domestically. Its three follow-ups, "Catching Fire," "Mockingjay — Part 1" and "Mockingjay — Part 2," grossed $425 million, $337 million and $282 million, respectively. Meanwhile, the first "Twilight" movie in 2008 grossed $192 million and, by the time the series reached its third installment, "Eclipse," the franchise was pulling in over $300 million in the U.S. Both franchises became cultural touchstones, spawning countless popular references, late-night comedy parodies, toys and Halloween costumes.
Do not expect "Allegiant" to do the same. Lionsgate fashioned "Divergent" as its next "Hunger Games," perhaps a bit too transparently — the first trailers were criticized by some critics for ripping off "The Hunger Games" and the franchise also cast two young, acclaimed actors as its leads. However, the "Divergent" franchise's box office receipts are not trending up, like "Hunger Games" and "Twilight," but down. History says "Allegiant" will not see a bigger box office return, following a $20 million dollar drop-off between the first two films.
Critics also never really warmed up to the franchise. Rotten Tomatoes, which aggregates film reviews and gives movie's a corresponding score, gave the first two film's a 40 percent and 29 percent positive rating, respectively ("Allegiant" received a dismal 11 percent).
http://gpsresidentialcamps.com/suphqleakedwatch-the-divergent-series-allegiant-online-full-movie
3 comments |
---|
18 Mar 2016
H0tl1ne
|
18 Mar 2016
quailman2101
I saw the Divergent but not Insurgent. It wasn't my favorite. I thought a couple scenes in particular were poorly done. I'm just going to throw this out there. I've read (listened to actually) all three of these popular series, Hunger Games, Divergent, and Maze Runner. Despite being a fan of the genre, I didn't particularly care for any of them. The Hunger games was alright, but I found the relationship between Katniss and Petta (not sure of the spellings, I listened remember) hard to follow. And the end of the whole city incursion in the last book was amazingly anti-climatic. The author unnecessarily killed too many characters in the Divergent series. And I just couldn't buy into the entire premise behind the Maze Runner trilogy (and this despite the crap loads of sci-fi I've consumed and enjoyed). I've found other series to be much better. The first two books in The Fifth Wave series have been pretty good. I remember enjoying the Under the Never Sky trilogy. I love everything in the Enderverse and other series by Card like Pathfinder and Homecoming. Also his stand alone books like Treason. I just finished book two of the Red Rising trilogy, and man, it is unbelievable. I can't wait to delve into the third. I really recommend going with the audio books for the Red Rising trilogy and for books by Card if you have the time for it. Anyway, I'm sure I'll catch some heat for my opinion of the current big 3. I know lots of people like them. Check out the books I mentioned though! |
Time for some pre-posting captcha.