Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Packs |
---|
Core Set |
Cyber Exodus |
Future Proof |
Creation and Control |
Second Thoughts |
Mala Tempora |
Double Time |
Honor and Profit |
Up and Over |
Order and Chaos |
The Valley |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from |
---|
None. Self-made deck here. |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
CT events MK2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
Hi there,
I am a long time Chaos Theory player. Always loved the Oracle May / Events variant, though it has lacked in power recently. You can find the deck I used to play here:
http://netrunnerdb.com/en/decklist/14510/ct-oracle-may
The general idea has always been to play Oracle May ASAP, mulligan for her if necessary, and then use her ability and call only events. Among these instant-effect cards there are doubles which fuel Power Nap - the best economy card in the deck.
What is strong about the old variant:
It's quick to setup, often surprises opponents with a Test Run into Femme Fatal.
Unfortunately, the deck has also several weaknesses:
Now, how to fix this? First of all, the deck must be consistent. In order to achieve that, we need to drop the card that makes it so fun to play - Oracle May. I decided to substitute her with Symmetrical Visage, a resource similar in function but weaker as far as raw power level is concerned. This achieved three goals:
Thanks to Symmetrical Visage the deck no longer struggles with discarding its own breakers and still provides the necessary click compression. What is more, the additional influence allows for the import of two I've Had Worse copies, which protect against damage and draw cards.
I also decided on including Magnum Opus, as it is a decent late game economy option and possible Test Run target. In order to be able to play this program two copies of the best Shaper console have to be slotted it - Astrolabe is present and still great against asset oriented decks.
Why no Comet? Simply put, I do not find the card that great even in a deck filled with events. This console actually increases randomness because most of the cards in this deck are parts of small combos or are viable only in certain situations, like Eureka, Scavenge, Test Run, Maker's Eye, Indexing, and Power Nap... even Maker's Eye falls into this category. Thus, when testing Comet I often found myself in a situation when I wasted the bonus click it generated, because playing events available at the moment made no sense. Sure, the console is awesome when it works. But IMO it does not warrant the high install cost.
Have fun and let me know what you think about this build.
2 comments |
---|
2 May 2015
sruman
|
2 May 2015
koniu
2x Scavenge because there are also 3 Eurekas that additionally fuel Power Nap. Granted, Eureka is a crappy card, but it usually gets discarded due to overdrawing and sometimes saves some money with Test Run. |
Why only 2 scavenge? It seems like a definite 3 of since you want to use it to decrease the cost of your programs and to scavenge femme around to different targets. I also think you're going to have serious issues with sentries over 2 strength and might want to consider dinosaurus over astrolabe. Certainly more expensive, but putting femme on it (direct or scavenging later) can really help with many sentries, saving you 2 - 4 credits for many sentry breaks. Therefore can pay for itself in 1 run.