Noise HQ attack2

x3r0h0ur 8969

Building a noise deck for a friend, I'm publishing 2 versions, I'm curious which one looks better.

This one has overall fewer mills, but uses more denial and more draw, while having more active economy (which means more of it). This one lacks clone chip which means more work will be done by wyrm on breaking, which is expensive, but again this build has more economy

We're trying to avoid crypsis + wyrm since crypsis's overhead costs is high, but cyberfeeder can offset that some.

Compare this to the one I posted before.

1 comments
16 Feb 2014 temporar

Have you tried Darwin instead of Wyrm? Seem to better fit this deck.