Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from |
---|
None. Self-made deck here. |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
Kate McCaffrey: Fun-employed Dog Whisperer | 3 | 0 | 3 |
XxX MLG [NOTO] KATE RIP XxX (1st Place Only Place) | 3 | 2 | 4 |
Cheeky Notoriety Kate, the Foodcoats Slayer, 11th London SC | 15 | 10 | 1 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
15 comments |
---|
10 Nov 2015
Groober
|
10 Nov 2015
sruman
I can attest to being inspired and fearful when seeing the d4v1d hit the table in King of Servers. And the clot + sac clone is just mean .... (oh neh ... you don't have 2 cvs' ready and waiting ... that's too bad). Slotting a 1-of symmetric for 3rd Quality Time would seem like a reasonable swap in an otherwise great twist on PPK. |
10 Nov 2015
nobo
|
11 Nov 2015
Saan
Here's a weird thought. After seeing Timmy's Whizzard deck with a Test Run in it, I noticed a cool synergy between it and D4v1d, where he could Test Run it up, make a couple runs using it, then it went to the top of his deck where he could draw it and reinstall with fresh counters later. I was thinking about the best way to try to fit D4v1d into Prepaid Kate to test it, and lo and behold, you basically built that deck. So what do you think about slotting a single Test Run in a deck like this? It might turn out to be wholly unnecessary, as maybe the additional counters aren't needed, but the idea seems interesting to me. So long as you can make a couple runs where you use them (or if there are enough barriers/5+ Str ICE subs on a single server), it might be kinda good, especially if the Test Run is reduced by the PPVPs. As I said, it might be unneeded, since Kate doesn't generally make tons of runs over the course of the game, and a good Kate player will usually have enough Lady counters to be able to see a game through without having to try too hard. However, with d4v1d also in the deck, it might be worth at least a look. Thoughts? |
11 Nov 2015
Iron_Soul
Hey |
13 Nov 2015
nobo
|
14 Nov 2015
Trenzor
I think one of the QT would be the only option. I'm going to give this version a go and see how she feels though. Looks like a great build. |
16 Nov 2015
Saan
Yeah, -1 QT was my cut too. Lady is another decent target, but after testing I do agree that it's just not needed for either. It ends up being more cute than good. However, I really didn't miss the third QT, so I might just throw an Escher in and call it a stew. |
19 Nov 2015
Smashman
I had an issue with lack of SOT for the Levy yesterday. Without a SOT, you potentially have to hold the Levy for a large part of the game, which is really undesired. If you trash it, then why have it at all? I considered dropping the R&DI, as there's already 3 Maker's Eyes and with the Levy, you can get them again. |
7 Dec 2015
sruman
Been enjoying testing this deck. One thing I'm thinking about -- that I thought I never would with a Kate deck -- is the 2nd astrolabe necessary? The 5th memory seems mostly a nice to have for the 3 program + smc times, atman + 3 + d4v1d, etc. but does not seem to be anything you need until quite late in the game. |
15 Dec 2015
cwoac
I'd rather drop a TME over the RDI - the power of 4 deep digs is not to be sniffed at. |
This deck is inspired. With d4vid, in one fell swoop, you've solved problems and created deck slots. All of us on team UK were struck down by fan boy passion by the list. it's some large percent vs fastro and just so good against the field. Great job. Any chance of same old sneaking in?
How many did it drop overall?