Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from | |||
---|---|---|---|
TeamCali CTM 1st @ Richmond SC 5-1 | 6 | 5 | 2 |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
Stop, Calibrate, and Listen 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
Winner Champaign Store Championship (12 players)
I had been playing CI for a month or so before doing very badly with it at a Chicago store championship, and so I decided to change things up. I knew CtM was good, but in practice online I was only winning about half of my games. Then I added the Team Sponsorships (admittedly an idea I stole from @grimwalker's NEH deck that crushed me in the previous tournament I attended). Most often they were there to recur calibration testing and commercial bankers group. Though twice on the day I recurred agendas that had been milled away by self-damage anarch decks.
This deck feels even stronger than CI to me. In a couple games it spat out 4-5 points from rnd early, but it was still able to rally and win in the end.
I also am a huge believer in AR-Enhanced Security now. I believe 3x is the right amount. Scoring one early can be game-deciding.
In swiss it faced Steve Cambridge (win), Geist (win), self-damage MaxX (lose), and ID the last round. In the cut it faced two different flavors of MaxX (reg-ass and self-damage) and won both games.
3 comments |
---|
5 Feb 2018
Yukon
|
5 Feb 2018
PureFlight
Just did well with a very similar list! Thoughts on a 3rd Team Sponsorship? Also, my tag+punishment package was a little different from yours, and I never felt like I had the right combination of tag punishment cards in hand. Would you make any changes from yours? |
6 Feb 2018
BraveLilToaster
I consulted with some Chicago players on the operation package and I think this one is pretty brutal. Only thing missing is psychographics but if you have all those tags on them already you're probably winning anyway. |
This gets a heart just from it's deckname. It looking like a quality deck that performs well is just bonus.