Hayley Stealth version 1

Legality (show more)
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest)
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active)
Standard Ban List 23.03
Standard Ban List 22.09
Standard Ban List 22.08
Standard Ban List 21.10
Standard Ban List 21.10
Standard Ban List 21.06
Standard Ban List 21.06
Standard Ban List 21.05
Standard Ban List 21.04
Standard Ban List 20.09
Standard Ban List 20.06
Standard MWL 3.4b
Standard MWL 3.4
Standard MWL 3.3
Standard MWL 3.2
Standard MWL 3.1
Standard MWL 3.0
NAPD MWL 2.2
NAPD MWL 2.1
NAPD MWL 2.0
NAPD MWL 1.2
NAPD MWL 1.1
NAPD MWL 1.0

Rotation
Pre-rotation decklist

Packs
Core Set
What Lies Ahead
Humanity's Shadow
Future Proof
Creation and Control
Opening Moves
The Spaces Between
First Contact
All That Remains
Breaker Bay
Chrome City
Old Hollywood
Data and Destiny

Card draw simulator
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more

Repartition by Cost

Repartition by Strength

Derived from
Pitchfork (Sure Gamble is a crutch.)	245	184	85

Inspiration for
None yet

Include in your page (help)

BlackTree 1

Hunting Grounds or Scrubber? Third SMC? Clot?

2 comments
26 May 2016 sruman A couple quick comments: You'll rarely see both Magnum and Pro-co in a deck since they'll compete for clicks and have anti-synergy. I would suggest stick with pro- and you can move from box-e to astrolabe and drop an akamatsu or 2 (and maybe all 3 if want to adjust cloaks to 2) to fit Kati Jones, technical writers, etc. as additional money. With Dagger, you don't really need femme. Having hunting grounds in the deck with a good sentry breaker (dagger) means there's really no good Femme targets you don't have covered. D4v1d is a great program no doubt, but stealth decks are the ones that least need it. Refractor, dagger, and lady are all efficient against big ice so I don't think the 4 inf. spend is warranted. The 4 inf. would work better as 1 parasite and another clone chip I think (or clot and clone + ? or ...) Similar argument for net-ready eyes, adding 1 strength to efficient breakers won't help that much in general. More RDI's, should go for 3 as R&D is your win condition. Given it's in faction, I think Artists Colony would be a better choice than data dealer. Honestly, given with a bit of re-arranging of econ, your only key pieces would be programs (moving to 3 SMCs at alot), I think you can move away from the whole fan-site thing to more money cards (or RDI's or maker's or ...) if you do switch up econ package a bit then definitely consider technical writers as they're great in stealth hayley.
28 May 2016 BlackTree `@sruman` Thanks for the comments. The memory is a consern and thats why there is the Box-E. I Actually had the Astrolabe (which is propably a better console than Box-E) before and if I take Mopus out, I don't need that MU anymore. Femme's biggest con is the cost and that has been a problem. Although, Femme plus Net-Ready Eyes equals Mimic, propably too an expensive one though. Femme with Scavenge is gold but I have other scavenge targets also. I wasn't sure about running NRE, but I'm not yet convinced to leave them out either. I thought that NRE would save stealth credits against ICE like Archer or something and that it would be usefull in general. Needs more testing I guess. I've never tested Technical Writers, but what I noticed with this deck is that later in the game, you don't need that much money. I guess the TW is kind of a late-game moneymaker? For D4v1d, i think i'll try replacing it with Clot. And also more SMC and RDI.

2 comments

26 May 2016 sruman

A couple quick comments:

You'll rarely see both Magnum and Pro-co in a deck since they'll compete for clicks and have anti-synergy. I would suggest stick with pro- and you can move from box-e to astrolabe and drop an akamatsu or 2 (and maybe all 3 if want to adjust cloaks to 2) to fit Kati Jones, technical writers, etc. as additional money.
With Dagger, you don't really need femme. Having hunting grounds in the deck with a good sentry breaker (dagger) means there's really no good Femme targets you don't have covered.
D4v1d is a great program no doubt, but stealth decks are the ones that least need it. Refractor, dagger, and lady are all efficient against big ice so I don't think the 4 inf. spend is warranted. The 4 inf. would work better as 1 parasite and another clone chip I think (or clot and clone + ? or ...)
Similar argument for net-ready eyes, adding 1 strength to efficient breakers won't help that much in general.
More RDI's, should go for 3 as R&D is your win condition.
Given it's in faction, I think Artists Colony would be a better choice than data dealer. Honestly, given with a bit of re-arranging of econ, your only key pieces would be programs (moving to 3 SMCs at alot), I think you can move away from the whole fan-site thing to more money cards (or RDI's or maker's or ...)
if you do switch up econ package a bit then definitely consider technical writers as they're great in stealth hayley.

28 May 2016 BlackTree

@sruman Thanks for the comments.

The memory is a consern and thats why there is the Box-E. I Actually had the Astrolabe (which is propably a better console than Box-E) before and if I take Mopus out, I don't need that MU anymore.

Femme's biggest con is the cost and that has been a problem. Although, Femme plus Net-Ready Eyes equals Mimic, propably too an expensive one though. Femme with Scavenge is gold but I have other scavenge targets also.

I wasn't sure about running NRE, but I'm not yet convinced to leave them out either. I thought that NRE would save stealth credits against ICE like Archer or something and that it would be usefull in general. Needs more testing I guess.

I've never tested Technical Writers, but what I noticed with this deck is that later in the game, you don't need that much money. I guess the TW is kind of a late-game moneymaker?

For D4v1d, i think i'll try replacing it with Clot. And also more SMC and RDI.