Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Packs |
---|
Core Set |
What Lies Ahead |
Trace Amount |
Cyber Exodus |
Humanity's Shadow |
Creation and Control |
Opening Moves |
Mala Tempora |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from | |||
---|---|---|---|
Red Denial v1.0 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
Inspiration for |
---|
None yet |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
3 comments |
---|
14 Nov 2013
moonwalker
|
14 Nov 2013
saetzero
i see what you want to do, and i won't try to alter that but theres 2 very big blocks in your way swordsman, and just 4 cheap ice on a server (ice wall ice wall enigma wall of static for example) if you need to get things moving, surge for your parasites might be a good option. otherwise i see this deck running out of steam and having limited options to come back. trashing ice with knights on it also presents a VERY VERY big problem. pawn might help that, but who knows. tl;dr - get tools for a back up plan imo |
14 Nov 2013
moonwalker
Swordsman is not a hard lock-out as in a pure Atman+Datasucker deck, because can easily be trashed by Parasite (which can be searched for by Djinn), and the deck has 6 recursion cards to recover a trashed Knight from the heap. About the 4 cheap rezzed ICEs, this is effectively an issue that should be considered (even if the player should use Xanadu/Rook/Vamp to prevent that from happening), and can be worth swapping in a single Crypsis in place of Imp to reduce the risk. |
Are 3 Knights (supported by Clone Chip and Deja Vu) enough as Icebreakers? Does this deck need a Crypsis or Darwin (both searchable for by Djinn) in support?