Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Packs |
---|
Core Set |
What Lies Ahead |
Cyber Exodus |
Humanity's Shadow |
Future Proof |
Creation and Control |
Opening Moves |
Mala Tempora |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from |
---|
None. Self-made deck here. |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
Andy's Events Deck post-MT v 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
2 comments |
---|
12 Jan 2014
nbove
|
12 Jan 2014
nbove
Also, running just 1 copy of each of your breakers with no way to recur them is risky, If you ever take damage or get hit with a program destroying ice, you are pretty much dead. You may want to consider pulling back some of your events to get more redundancy in your breakers. |
Hmmm, I think I would drop ZU.13 and take Corroder. Then use peacock in faction to break code gates. Aurora is just such an awful breaker it is hard to justify ever putting it in a deck. Also, if you are trying to slow down a rush deck, there are a lot more cheap barriers than there are cheap code gates. Aurora is awful at breaking cheap barriers, but peacock is decent a breaking cheap code gates. Peacock can get past enigma or next bronze for 2 (2 for enigma if you run on last click, otherwise it's 4 or 2 + 1 click). However, aurora has to pay 4 to get past wall of static, ice wall with 1 token, bastion, or himitsu-bako, all very common ice. All told, even though they are very similar, aurora is objectively the worse breaker. If aurora had 2 base strength, it might be a close call, but at 1, you are much better off with peacock.