Security Subversion attempt 1

I've been tinkering with Sunny since D&D was added to here and I think this is the build I'm going with. It lacks recursion which is why I run 3 copies of each of the breakers. I feel Sunny's console has potential, I just think Femme can handle the situations where ICE is giving you trouble as well, or better, than Security console. Plus I own 2 alt art Femmes and I want to play them. ;) I went with 3 ZU.13 because striker is just weak overall. Shrike is strong all around and sherman is comparable enough to corroder bu striker just loses to ZU.13 in the commonly encountered ICE area. That being said, often one point is all that stands between any of these breakers being as, or more, efficient than their counterparts so Datasucker is invaluable in addition to potentially forcing a purge on occasion. Redundancy in the deck is purposeful so we can get what we need asap. Good draw between QT/Earthrise/Baby, Great econ between Mopus/Datasucker/Multithreader/UC. All of that adds up to lots of ability to generate creds and/or run efficiently. This deck is meant to make well planned runs with good information. GSC is to make sure you're running R&D when it's best for you. The ability to make the corp wonder if you're running to score or trash a card in well worth the click loss, especially when you're set up. With one of each of the breakers and a security chip, no remote is safe. Infiltration makes sure the remote is worth the run and the security chip is worth 2 or more str to all 3 breakers. DMC is there to give you more MU and another link because why not make the trace ICE post D&D weaker? You only really need one out to have a Mopus, 2 multithreader, and a Datasucker which should be plenty enough econ to make the Corp sweat. Caprice, Batty, and Ash can still be troublesome for this deck so I will likely drop the AtG for 2 councilman when it drops. Any suggestions for handling those cards pre councilman is appreciated. Legwork for obvious reasons and SoT to reuse it or Infiltration if necessary. Overall, I think the draw and redundancy of the deck mitigates her 50 card minimum. (which I think was wholly unnecessary for her ability) I debated Datasucker for a while but the fact that just one sucker token makes the difference for your breakers in regards to so many ICE in the 2 and 5 str range made the choice for me. I really wanted Street Peddler for the ability to instant install an icebreaker depending on the rez but I finally decided against it due to lack of recursion. This deck wants to set up and threaten to get in wherever it wants easily and probably cheaply too. As always, constructive criticism is welcome.