Aghora does well in a Chameleon+LLDS deck, or when paired with cheap/specialized breakers like Inti, Yog, and Femme. It's useful against most of the higher-strength ice that these breakers struggle with, but it falls short of being a top-shelf solution because there will always be a few ice that fall between the cracks and can't be broken by either the standard breaker or the deva. It's a solid choice in casual games for certain deck types but I don't think it has the legs to be an all-around winner.

39

Vamadeva is the opposite of solo breakers like Eater and Faust. It is an excellent fourth breaker for any deck that already has strong solutions for barriers, code gates, and sentries. It breaks every trap and every mythic ice in the game, so with a full standard suite you can literally break anything. As an added bonus, it is more efficient than Mongoose or Shrike against many common sentry ice (Cortex Lock, Data Raven, Gutenberg, Guard, Hunter, Rainbow), and superior to Zu13 or Striker for almost every 1-subroutine code gate with strength 2 or higher.

You might not install this deva in every game, but if your opponent is using trap or mythic ice, it is your one-card solution that isn't fiddly like Atman, Brahman, or Crypsis, and its efficiency against sentries and code gates can allow you to recoup its high install cost over the course of several runs.

39
I think you overestimate this card's efficiency against sentries - ichi and architect are big names and impervious to this breaker. I think it's an excellent code gate solution, though. —
I'm not sure I see your point. Suppose you ran R&D protected by Gutenberg and Data Raven. Disregarding the auto-tag from Data Raven for the moment, Mongoose breaks in for 12 credits, Shrike gets in for 10, and Vamadeva gets in for 8. —