Legitimate Businessmen v2.2
| Legality (show more) |
|---|
| Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
| Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
| Rotation |
|---|
| Pre-rotation decklist |
| Packs |
|---|
| Core Set |
| What Lies Ahead |
| A Study in Static |
| Creation and Control |
| Opening Moves |
| Second Thoughts |
| True Colors |
| Double Time |
| Upstalk |
| Up and Over |
| All That Remains |
| Card draw simulator |
|---|
|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
| Repartition by Cost |
|---|
| Repartition by Strength |
|---|
| Derived from | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Legitimate Businessmen v2.1 | 18 | 14 | 17 |
| Inspiration for | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Legitimate Businessmen v2.3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Include in your page (help) |
|---|
Snake Eyes 4651
Legitimate Businessmen: a deck powered by the good and honest people of Weyland Consortium.
This latest iteration of Legitimate Businessmen is including such Weyland classics such as Hostile Takeover and Archer. The required space was made getting rid of Corporate War, Errand Boy and 2x Grims. The Bad Publicity stays the same (3 sources) here - which is a manageable amount for Elizabeth Mills to take care of and make NAPD Contract scores not that difficult.
With a single Bad Pub, NAPD Contract looks like Priority Requisition - which can really mess up a runner's math.
See the previous version of this deck for a nice speech on how awesome Elizabeth Mills is, and some of the other decisions in this deck such as SEA Source vs Midseason Replacements.
Possible changes for the future
I'm debating trying to fit a single Taurus back in this deck - but as it stands the only thing that I'd really want to take out for it would be an Archer. I don't want to have too many high strength sentries in this deck to encourage the runner to fetch anything better than a Mimic. I feel as though 3 sentries at such a level is about the sweet spot - avoiding rezzing them until it is most beneficial. Further playtesting with the double Archer will be done here until I start dabbling with a Taurus. A new version will be posted if I put it back in and it works out well.
| 1 comments |
|---|
|
22 Jan 2015
Glitch
|
I love the no nonsense approach these decks are taking to Weyland. It's this style of Weyland that really sang to me when I first started this game. I definitely need to sleeve this up and give it a spin!
My only question is; do you ever find yourself wanting the credit opportunities of Corporate War or Geothermal Fracking over the taxing of NAPD Contract?