Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Packs |
---|
Core Set |
Cyber Exodus |
A Study in Static |
Future Proof |
Creation and Control |
Opening Moves |
Second Thoughts |
Mala Tempora |
Fear and Loathing |
Double Time |
Order and Chaos |
Old Hollywood |
Data and Destiny |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from | |||
---|---|---|---|
The CI 7-point-turn Vanity Project | 5 | 3 | 2 |
Inspiration for |
---|
None yet |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
See the previous version of the deck, for combos with 3 SfSS. This deck only includes two so that we can fit the 3rd PS, and two GFI. Please see the previous version (see attribution) for a complete description of generally how to play it.
http://netrunnerdb.com/en/decklist/25032/the-ci-7-point-turn-vanity-project
Why is this version interesting?
Why is this combo "worse" than the previous, 3x SfSS version?
Hand requirements:
The sequence:
15 s.
This combo is less flexible as the first AD must include a SfSS. In the previous version, it could include the Interns/SfMM, so the second Jackson wasn't strictly required.
As before, slots in the ADs can be freed under the following conditions:
If you do not have SfMM in hand, then we simply have the following sequence:
We are essentially identical to the previous composition's AD structure, and we just replaced a SfSS with a Biotic. This ends up costing 6 s more, unfortunately (for a total of 21 d)! Ouch. We'll, there's a reason we have the Restructures, I guess.
Hand requirements:
The sequence:
18 s...a significant increase from 12 in the previous composition with 3x SfSS.
2 comments |
---|
20 Aug 2015
kookoobah
|
20 Aug 2015
ycombinator
There are only two SfSS, so you can't have 3 in the 3rd AD. You can do what you say, but you have to use a Biotic + 2 advance, taking the cost up by 6 s (see the second part of the discussion of Combo I). This deck attempts to minimize the combo pieces that require influence so that we can fit in both VP and GFIs. See the previous iteration of the deck for a version with 3x SfSS where what you say is true. |
In "Combo 1", you can still combo out with different cards, the 2nd Jackson, or the Vanity Project can be replaced with GFI. You switch out the SfSS in the 1st AD with the Interns (which ever is missing out of the 3 -- Jackson, GFI, Vanity) in the 3rd AD. It makes the combo more flexible, but if you replace either of them with a GFI, you can't combo out against Leela. Still, it gives you other options against other runners.