Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Version 1 for testing. Debating between DDoS vs. Lamprey. Thoughts on both:
DDoS on a Peddler early could turn into a turn 2 surprise Wanton / Medium Dig.
Lamprey seems good for extra HQ pressure, but makes the deck more vulnerable to purge. And the Clone Chips might be over-taxed here, if we normally want to use them on Imp and D4vid refreshing.
4 comments |
---|
12 Dec 2015
esutter479
|
13 Dec 2015
x3r0h0ur
you probably need -1 DDoS -1 Wanton and +2 earthrise, because draw is missing IMO. Clicking to draw is the worst, and even with those -2 things, you'd be more likely to see them with the + draw. Parasite is pretty tough to exclude though. |
13 Dec 2015
Walker Net Ranger
Hey guys, thanks for the feedback!
And re: Datasucker, of course that card is strong and I might have to go back to that. But the full rig with Atman at 5 (or at 4 if you find the Net-Ready Eyes first) seems like a good answer to the #Tollbooth, Assassin, what have you, after the D4v1d counters are out. It seems reasonably flexible, but Datasucker might still just be better, hard to say. |
13 Dec 2015
Walker Net Ranger
Yeah it's hard to not play Parasite, I've been toying with the idea of some Cutlery events and/or Immolation Script to remove ICE but again that anti-synergizes with Street Peddler. I'll do some testing and see what works best. Thanks again! |
Love this...very much. :) I plan on bringing my Kim deck to Store Championships in a few weeks (check it out - netrunnerdb.com) and I'm not sure if I've put enough econ in mine. I really love some of your includes, but just wondering...have you considered HQ multi-access at all? Sniping kill pieces is muy frustrating for Weyland or NBN. Also, Suckers would rule in this as well...D4v1d isn't forever, after all.