Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
This placed first in a 6 person GNK at Monster Comic Lounge in Halifax, Canada. The tournament format used was 3 rounds of Swiss with no cut.
This deck had 3 wins, facing off against Kate, Smoke, and Adam.
It's counterpart in the tournament is here.
I was curious how Skorpios would affect the meta, so I decided to bring it out to a GNK to test. I think it's strong. All runners I played against were running standard amounts of protection/redundancy on their breakers, and this deck created locks in every game.
The game plan is spam Batty w/ FiHP and JH to trigger trashes on the runners turn, and feed them agendas one at a time to trigger Hunter Seeker trashes on your turn. Power Shutdown low-hanging fruit.
Paywall and HT are the answer to Rumor Mill (no, the MWL did not kill this card) and Employee Strike. Either can be devastating to the game plan. Consider slotting a second if worried about seeing these (perhaps axing the Crisium).
Create a situation where they either cannot break Ice Wall or Hortum, and call it a game. If they manage to create a scenario where you cannot get the lock off (through deck-building or scoring agendas before you find your Hunter Seekers), you still have a game plan in using Batty to create scoring windows.
As 7 of your 10 agendas make you money, you should be aiming to play fairly aggressively once you find a Hunter Seeker. If they score, you're closer to your lock. If they don't, obviously this is also fine.
44 cards is icing on the cake here. Sapper is everywhere, and you should find your Hunter Seekers quickly. The deck can, and should, move fast.
23 comments |
---|
8 May 2017
Benjen
|
8 May 2017
Ironcache
I don't think it has any grand synergy with the ID though; they aren't going to pitch anything they're sad to lose to it. For the sake of not hindering my economy, I gave preference to Paywall. If you try it out feel free to post back with how it goes. Curious to see how this archetype fares for others. |
8 May 2017
PurinaBisonChow
How did you feel Bloodletter performed? I like that it makes the runner use a Datasucker token to break it with Mimic and, at 3 to rez, it requires the runner spend 6 to break with MKUltra. I don't like that it gives the runner the option on what option they'd prefer to fire. |
8 May 2017
Myriad
If econ is good enough, Changeling is really good in Skorp. Let's you adapt to what is more taxing or is locked out. |
8 May 2017
Ironcache
|
8 May 2017
Ironcache
If I was to try it, I think my initial change would be -1 Ice Wall and -1 Bloodletter for +2 Changeling. |
8 May 2017
Ironcache
|
10 May 2017
Myriad
Do you think this deck would be improved with GFI? Or does it really not need it? I ask because you probably can save two influence for whatever tech cards you want in your current set up and you have a couple of okay options. |
10 May 2017
Ironcache
The game plan here is to home in on the weakness in their breaker suite, crack it open, and lock them out. Batty (w/ trash sub) lets me do that better than any card in the game (neglecting the niche and situationally useful, such as HS). FiHP lets me get Batty back in play better than any card in the game. Jackson lets me find and recur my Batty and FiHP. The deck wants a lot of other things with its influence, but not more than it wants those three things. The agendas are all either economy cards (and counter current tools, with HT), or a 3/2 that optionally lets me tutor for Batty. They serve a purpose, and losing them (along with some of the three aforementioned cards) to slot a 5/3 that doesn't help my game plan seems like something I don't want to do. I think I'd consider Rototurret before GFI. Maybe like -1 JH -1 Bloodletter +1 Preemptive +1 Roto or something. So, my recommendation would be to try the list vanilla and see if you still feel the same. If you still feel like you want GFI, a couple ideas: first, if you're worried about runner currents, you could try -1 Jackson -2 CST for +1 GFI +1 HT +1 Paywall/Preemptive. If you're looking to just lower agenda density, then perhaps -2 CST -1 Oaktown/Atlas -1(/2) Jackson -1(/0) FiHP for +2 GFI +2 Preemptive +1 Cobra/IPO. |
10 May 2017
Myriad
|
10 May 2017
Ironcache
Critic doesn't hurt this too much (Batty and PS still function). Sac cons is the problem. If they start getting a board state you can't deal with, Batty for ETR instead of trash. Note that I haven't come across a board state that I haven't been able to clear; my only play time on this deck is the GNK games. I'm hoping to get more testing in soon. But that's the theoretical plan. |
10 May 2017
Myriad
Good to know. I am still trying to figure out if aggressive play and power shutdown is the best line of play, or if you should be slotting best defense for sac cons and other 0 cost cards. I also have been toying with Cronos in the deck in place of a 2 pointer. Cronos does a lot of work against Anarch, especially the Opus based MaxX or Frantic Coding builds. |
11 May 2017
Snowscoran
My main concern here is that there's not enough "Trash a program" subroutines for Batty to target. I would consider -1 Batty -3 Ice Wall +3 Rototurret +1 IPO (or maybe Preemptive Action). |
11 May 2017
Ironcache
Lowering the Batty count isn't right for this deck. I made sure with the amount of Trash subs, but if you find it doesn't work for you, swap Bloodletter for Cobra. |
11 May 2017
Ironcache
I made do*... As an addendum, Batty is the driving force of this deck, and, given that he's a one shot (and you ideally want to FiHP 2 of him), you want maximal chance of finding him. 3 in 44 makes that happen fairly fast Likewise, I usually found Sapper pretty fast and had no issues setting up the Batty trash, but I can understand the desire for more trash subs. |
11 May 2017
Myriad
I have played the deck a fair amount and I think that there are enough. My only suggestion really thus far is dropping a bloodletter for a Wormhole so you have a bit more versatility on a central or scoring server on what sub you hit. You can also bluff as a colossus or a hortum, which is okay. I also like x1 changeling in the same spot. It can really help with the lockout. |
11 May 2017
Ironcache
I like the wormhole idea. And Bloodletter is definitely the Flex spot in the ICE. How've your results been, if you don't mind my prodding? |
11 May 2017
Myriad
Its pretty interesting! I haven't gotten enough reps with Wormhole yet, but I think its a great piece of ice for many matchups so I will keep testing. Thus far, I think the deck is great against stuff that isn't teching against Skorp and even with tech the matchups are winnable so long as you rush hard enough. The tricky part is not cutting your tech. There are a trinity of tech cards that really shore up your matches and all of them bare mention. 1.) Chronos - This is an Anarch and some Criminal matchups silver bullet. Because this deck is part never advance, it slots in nicely. Early it can lock down some heap breakers by bluffing as batty. Late game you can throw it in a remote and maybe RFG everything the runner was trying to bank. Its good. Not sure how to efficiently fit it yet, but I like it a lot. On the plus side if you cut a 2 pointer to slot two, you may get 3 triggers of best defense in a game. 2.) Power Shutdown - I am actually losing some favor with this one, but its great vs Criminal who don't have as much redundancy in their rig. Sadly these slots will likely get cut down to a x1. I hardly ever play it. 3.)Best Defense - To me, this is a better Power Shutdown most of the time as it can hit Sac Cons, which I have even seen in Criminal decks. This is a shaper tech card, but it has some other fringe application. (It makes the DLR matchup winnable!). Rush is definitely the right call and I think the ice is almost perfect. I think there are about three cards that can be tightened up, but otherwise it seems good. I plan on taking something similar to a regional this weekend. |
15 May 2017
Myriad
Took Skorp to regional and only dropped a single game. I didn't get anywhere near the cut though because my runner game was terrible. I am beginning to play with cutting Bloodletter for more binary ice. It will seriously stink though to lose the only thing that punishes face check, but it plays well into the strategy of the deck. |
17 May 2017
Ironcache
Glad to hear that Skorpios worked out (sorry that the runner flubber). What were you thinking of replacing the Bloodletter with? |
20 May 2017
Myriad
|
Would Housekeeping be a good include? Or is money too tight? Nice deck ad congrats on the win. I may sleeve this up and give it a whirl.