Chaos Theory (minimal jank, maximum consistency)

Card draw simulator
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
Repartition by Cost
Repartition by Strength
Derived from
Theory of Simplicity v3.0
Inspiration for
None yet
Include in your page (help)

cameronwlucas 21

Played something similar to this at my first tournament.

Because I wanted to play fast (my goal was to have no games go to time) I wanted something with minimal jank and fairly simple piloting.

I wanted Magnum Opus and Personal Workshop out asap and used Stimhack to set up my rig early on.

Any suggestions and comments are greatly appreciated!

2 comments
26 Nov 2015 haywire

I wouldn't play 3 Astrolabe, beacuse you can only use 1 and 2 Personal Workshop are enough too. 3 Magnum Opus are one too much, but I'd suggest to play all the Breakers twice.But you should play 3 Diesel, because to get teh Workshops early is nice but useless, if you don't get Cards to put on.

I play CT in a very similiar Deck and it's a lot of Fun :)

26 Nov 2015 sruman

I agree with Haywire's comment on astrolabe. 2 is enough. Given 3 clone chips and 3 SMC's I don't think you need to double the breakers though.

Although you can get to 8 memory, I think you'll often a multi-threader sitting in your hand waiting for memory. I would drop one for another stimhack (one of the basis of your econ). Additionally, given how taxing R&D servers can get for shapers, I think you should drop the indexing for a 2nd makers eye. Perhaps something like:

-1 Indexing -1 astrolabe -1 multi-threader -1 film critic

+1 makers +1 stimhack +2 diesel

You want your personal workshops in early turns, so I'd stick with 3 since you'll probably mulligan rule for magnum or PW. Although I think you probably want even more draw if you can squeeze it in (like -1 magnum for +1 QT or Earthrise). I envision the early turns as draw as many cards as you can, put them on a personal workshop, stimhack off a bunch of stuff when you find it. Just some thoughts.