Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Packs |
---|
Core Set |
Future Proof |
Opening Moves |
True Colors |
Fear and Loathing |
All That Remains |
Order and Chaos |
Data and Destiny |
Democracy and Dogma |
The Liberated Mind |
23 Seconds |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from |
---|
None. Self-made deck here. |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
CTM Total-Tag-Punishment MWL2.0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
1st place UK Nationals 2016: CTM Tempo Rush | 47 | 33 | 4 |
1.1.1.1 Ctm (second place Enschede) | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
Not much time to write this up properly but this deck is a monster. Use the tempo of the CtM ID + Bankers/Sensie to rush hard. Punish them with HHN if they stop you, News into Closed or ASI if they don't. Finish them off by scoring out behind Booth or with EoI/Psycho.
28 comments |
---|
29 Jul 2016
wynalazca
|
29 Jul 2016
mawa
Can I point out how nuts the amount of CtM we're getting at the moment on the front page of Netrunnerdb? I'm currently counting 4 out of the top 5 lists, and 7 total. I mean, a lot of them are taking all sorts of different routes to victory, but still, it's really nuts and it's making me scared. |
29 Jul 2016
PureFlight
|
30 Jul 2016
moistloaf
|
31 Jul 2016
rotage
I took this to Reading regional (100 ish people) went 3-2 in Swiss (IDed last 2 rounds) and didn't play it in the cut. My two losses one was when the runner went tag me after HNN and hit 5pts worth of Agendas in a couple of R&D runs. The second lose was when a Geist siphon deck went tag me early on and kept trashing must of my assets and sipon spaming me Both games I made mistakes due a lack of testing with the deck (3 games on Jnet the day before) not sure what changes I would make to it though but was definitely effective |
31 Jul 2016
TheBigBoy
Yeah learning how to switch to being defensive against tagme is the hardest thing to learn. Keep practicing the deck and you get there :) |
31 Jul 2016
TheBigBoy
|
1 Aug 2016
bubbathegoat
I like it, I'm running something kinda similar I think. I run fewer econ cards and smaller ICE, with more focus on scoring quickly. I try to focus my gameplay on driving a credit advantage into my favor until the runner decides to go tag-me, which looks like the same thing you are doing. I'm using Mumbad Virtual Tour as a remote-check punishment/central defense, so I more aggressively attack the runner's credits than build up my own. |
1 Aug 2016
jawZ
On another note: Mind sharing your view on why you added the according numbers of Hard-Hitting News, Closed Accounts and Exchange of Information? |
1 Aug 2016
TheBigBoy
In my latest version I actually have -1 bankers +1 SSCG + 1 Mumba Temple -1 CVS. I found I never used the CVS. I didn't want to cut my best econ card for 2 copies of a really expensive card, and Mumba Temple is a card that gets worse in multiples so a single copy is good value. |
1 Aug 2016
TheBigBoy
The main reason for the SanSan is to provide do-or-die situations for Val who is blackmail spamming. |
2 Aug 2016
lolpaca
After a few games, this does seem crazy strong. Even in my game vs Prepaid Kate, where the runner had 2 and was trashing my Pads and CBGs religiously, I still won without much trouble just by clicking for credits most of the time. I like the idea of working a SanSan in. Would you not want to drop one of the Sensies instead of CVS, or is it a case of wanting to see it as soon as possible? |
3 Aug 2016
poorhaus
Definitely a strong deck. Sleeved this up and won all 4 or 5 games, with basically only the advice that you want sensie to start (which is very true). I'll def keep testing. I do wonder if the fact that there're only 2x HHN to trace for tags will hurt it in replays. The runner sometimes had windows to run/score where I couldn't tag them afterwards for lack of HHN but of course they didn't know that. Sensie helped find the pieces but if the Sensies all got trashed I could see it being an uphill climb. Seems like scoring a BN off the table is the most reliable way to tag, but a runner who checks remotes can avoid that. That's another good argument for the SanSan/Mumba version. Closed Accounts is an MVP for sure. Though a bursty runner like Prepaid Kate may be able to bounce back quickly. Haven't played that deck with this yet but I've seen it more lately.
|
3 Aug 2016
TheBigBoy
Rumor mill doesn't matter. It only blanks Jackson. Clear Strike by scoring a news. |
3 Aug 2016
JDC_Wolfpack
Being one of
|
4 Aug 2016
rojazu
This deck can get stomped over by tagme anarchs. Have you tested crisiums in the 3rd banker slot? |
4 Aug 2016
Necro
|
5 Aug 2016
MrMint
I put a midseason in there tho for when the runner is a 20+ credits, HHN is less of a threat. Anyway, great deck. :) |
8 Aug 2016
spags
Pulled Herrings/Bankers for 2 SSCG. Went 5-3 at GC, losing to two DLR, and a Keyhole. ICE can't keep them out, and two of them dropped Slums T1/2, with Scrubbers to boot. |
10 Aug 2016
saracenus
Having just watched
|
10 Aug 2016
x3r0h0ur
I think the biggest problem with adding ZJ to this type of deck vs argus is that you need ice that can actually stop or tax out the runner, and with the argus ability, unless they're just taking the meat, you get another tag for them to cope with. Otherwise, if they can survive having 1 tag for 1 corp turn, they clear 3 and run the judge, saving them from boom/traffic. Then they clear the last tag later, preventing the corp from sticking more tags with ZJ. You would have to run big brother to capitalize on the fork of HHN + ZJ. Also CBG is very good, not having 3 seems tough. |
Thanks for posting publicly. Now I know what to tech against next week :)