A Comparative Study of Corporate Efficiency

spiraldawn 10

This has been my fool-around deck at the weekly meet up, and it's really fun to play. I'm not sure how well it would do in a tournament, since we play pretty casual, but it's been consistent at getting wins, especially if the corp doesn't see what's going on until it's too late.

Pretty much just use your Replicators to puke out LLDS and Macrodrives. Face check ice early to try get some rezzed. Once you have a Chameleon or a SMC on the table, start hitting it hard. With an optimal setup, you'll be breaking ice for little to no cost, and having clicks out the wazoo with Hayley's ability and Autoscripters triggering off the Chameleons. Corroder is in there in case of Wraparounds and for when the server is 3 deep. The only weakness I worry about is Mother Goddess and that other ice without a normal type.

5 comments
25 Sep 2015 robofrogg

Did you say plural autoscripters? It is unique....only 1 can be installed at a time.

25 Sep 2015 CommissarFeesh

If Corroder is only there for Wraparound, why not swap it for Inti? Free to install, saves you 2 influence, and costs the same to break Wraparound (or just sets it to str 0 so you can chameleon through). Added bonus, you can now include Parasite as a one-off ;)

25 Sep 2015 spiraldawn

@robofrogg typo, my bad. @CommissarFeesh Great idea! That one slipped past me. I'm always happy to throw in a Parasite whenever I can, too

26 Sep 2015 sruman

Suggestions:

  • Add 1 or 2 Sahasrara to make the Chameleon's free each install.
  • Add NRE to pump strength of chameon
  • Add tech. writers, each getting 1 credit per install will make alot of money.

I'd remove -3 easy mark, -3 infiltration to make space.

26 Sep 2015 spiraldawn

@srumanI see where you're coming from, but:
• Macrodrives, while a little pricier, do the same thing as Shasraras, but I can pull them consistently with Replicator.
• LLDS is doing a better job for me, and works on multiple installs a turn, plus the Replicators are again putting them consistently in my hand.
• Technical Writers I like, and I'm definitely gonna have to put it in.
Thanks for the insights!