Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Packs |
---|
Core Set |
What Lies Ahead |
Cyber Exodus |
Future Proof |
Opening Moves |
True Colors |
Upstalk |
First Contact |
Breaker Bay |
Data and Destiny |
Salsette Island |
The Liberated Mind |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from |
---|
None. Self-made deck here. |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
Cheers love! - Tracer | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
This is the deck I used to great effect at the Brno 2016 Regionals (top seed after Swiss, 2nd overall). Some people have inquired about the list, so here it is. The runner deck I played was a Prepaid Whizzard build.
First of all, full credit and kudos to the guy I saw play this online, he’s the originator of the lion’s share of this (you know who you are, please let me know so I can credit you properly... "I love how people think this isn't a competitive deck" was the exact quote if memory serves) – I just polished it, optimized it and made it fit my playstyle more. (EDIT: it was @eedok
- thanks for the awesome concept!)
Track record-wise, this deck has brought me through 5 rounds of Swiss (no super-bye or ID bullshit) and into the finals through the loser’s bracket, without dropping a game. Some timed wins against @Korrigan
’s Hayley were involved, but those were in no way a clear-cut case either way.
At its core, it’s a tax-you-out-of-the-game MN thing. However, two cards from the second half of the Mumbad cycle have pushed it from the “annoying” status these decks have always occupied into straight-up “trollificus magnificus” status. Those two cards are Aryabhata Tech and Exchange of Information. Let’s discuss them in a bit more detail.
So, one of the problems of a tax-by-trace deck has always been that traces give the runner two outs: either pay the trace, or face the consequences of being traced. That choice means they always get to choose the better option for themselves, easily making the trace war concept a losing proposition for the corp side in the long run. Aryabhata Tech changes that by adding two new consequences to letting a trace succeed: netting you a credit and costing them a credit. Might not seem much, until you realize two things:
Now, if only we had a way to trigger traces at will. Oh wait, we do – Restructured Datapool. Which brings us to…
Full disclosure: I honestly believe this card is stupid beyond belief in its published form. It probably shouldn’t have cost zero, it probably should have been neutral with 2 influence, and it most certainly shouldn’t have worked with a single tag. And don’t even get me started on the interactions with Breaking News, which only serves to further illustrate the brokenness of that particular agenda.
OK, with that out of the way, what does EoI do for us? It stops us from losing, and a lot of the time it actually scores our most critical agenda on the cheap. Restructured Datapool has always been a high-variance play: extremely brutal when scored, but a huge liability, and trying to score it and failing could easily lose you the game. EoI basically completely subverts the downsides. You just try to rush it out, and if you fail, no biggie – you’ve set up your opponent to hold it for you until you’re ready to steal it. Thanks to the agenda suite we have, this can even be delayed a little under certain circumstances. So, agenda suite:
Only two Datapools because it’s enough, and you don’t want to risk random losses before you can swap one of the out. Breaking News because it’s just stupid with EoI, and because it’s super-easy to score – remember, you need to have an agenda to give to the runner in exchange. Quantum Predictive Model because nothing beats the opponent scoring your stuff for you (works extremely well with Manhunt), and Global Food Initiative because we’re aiming to win with 3 agendas, and at least one of them will be a 1-pointer.
It might seem counter-intuitive at first – we’re playing a deck that has both Midseasons and Psychographics, and that actualy aims to bury the opponent under tags anyway. So Beale seems like it might be good here. But to make space for it, I’d have to drop two of the 1-pointers (packing a single Beale and a Fast Track), or a 1-pointed and a Global Food (making room for 2 Beales). But that gives more 2-pointers to the runner, making it easier for them to win in a single swoop. Also, I rarely have the money to do a 7-point PsychoBeale or the need to do so – sitting at 4 points is a frequent occurrence, so Psychoing out a Global Food works just fine. Given all this, the 1-pointers with their crazy effects seem simply better to me. Tl;dr: try the Beale version if you’re so inclined, I found it less dependable.
Simple: Aim to be annoying for Faust while packing as many traces as possible. Gutenberg is a particular MVP, given how full of kitty my RnD often is.
Aryabhata is the bread and buter of this deck, no need to explain its inclusion. Maybe just a comment that miht not be immediately obvious – if you get one out and have a Datapool scored, it becomes a superior version of clicking for credits. Should you be fortunate enough to get two of them to stick, it’s like having Capital Investors that make the runner lose money and give them tags. Needless to say, awesome beyond belief.
The thing that sometimes raises peoples’ eyebrows is the inclusion of Primary Transmission Dish – seems like overkill given the ID we’re playing, no? Actually, no – a lot of the traces we need to run are base 2 (Manhuntand Datapool), and also a surprise rez of Dish can get you +1 on a Midseason, which is sometimes the difference between conecting and not connecting it. As soon as you get to use its credits twice before the runner trashes it, you’re at +4 credits. Seems worthy enough of two slots.
Nothing spectacular to see here – bunch of tagging, bunch of tag punishment, some econ, 2 Archived Memories to recycle whatever’s needed – the most common targets are Aryabhata Tech and SEA Source, with the occasional Manhunt also thrown in for good measure.
The list you see here deviates slightly from what I played at the Regionals – instead of the second SEA Source and The All-Seeing I, I played a Foxfire and a Tollbooth. Those were both mistakes and I found myself sorely wanting both of those cards, so I swapped them into further iterations.
The finals game against @hsiale’s Kate was caught on camera, you can watch it here!
32 comments |
---|
25 Jun 2016
Saan
|
25 Jun 2016
dragonblazer
Thoughts on Data Raven? Is is the case of the current ice's effects being too similar? |
25 Jun 2016
shimya
Looks really good! However, it seems you are relying on a few assets outside of Museum/Asset spam deck. How do you deal with Whizzard: Master Gamer? |
25 Jun 2016
moistloaf
I'm confounded as to what you do when your assets don't stick. Seems pretty easy for Anarchs to stay on top of those, leaving you with a measley ICE suite |
26 Jun 2016
Spaceman_Spiff
I also fail to see how you pressure runners without Astro. You have to either try and score a 5/3 behind ice like Caduceus and Viper or have the runner make the mistake of running breakerless into a bunch of tracer ice. Exchange of Information seems like the largest saving grace here. |
26 Jun 2016
PeekaySK
That's pretty much why it isn't in right now :)
Two MVPs for the Anarch matchup: Manhunt and SEA Source/The All-Seeing I. Manhunt gets really draining on resources if you're not unlucky enough to lose it, like, the turn after it gets played. SEA/I hurts Anarchs a lot, since they are totally resource-dependent and operate on pretty low credits usually (so it's not unusual to be able to nuke both their card draw and their econ base at the same time). If they want to keep a bank big enough to be safe, they usually have to play at a much lower tempo, which you can use.
If it helps, think of Exchange of Information as taking Astroscript's "Retarded Card Of The Day" job in this deck :) |
26 Jun 2016
Gerrark
Firstly, I love this deck, and am so glad when I see one of my favorite IDs being made to work so, so well. Using Psycho but not using Beale always seems like a mistake at first, but you've obviously proven what few of us have always known: the two cards are not mutually inclusive, and are just great on there own. Secondly, I'm sorry I can't say this privately, since I don't want to make this into a big thing, but I'd really appreciate it if you held off on the "r" word. I can't wait to see what else you come up with! |
27 Jun 2016
Calimsha
Lol that's funny. We've been brewing similar stuff with Feel free to connect on slack if you want to discuss about it, i've got a tons of ideas :) |
27 Jun 2016
Eji1700
1 of Troll? Cheap to rez, can't be broken, isn't super easy to parasite, and is obnoxious as hell to pay for when you don't need to. Its weak early since they can just run last click to void it, but once you get your tech's up it seems like it'd be taxing as hell. Maybe instead of a pop up window or viper? |
27 Jun 2016
PeekaySK
On its inclusion: If I had one more piece of ICE, it could easily be a Troll. However, I'm not losing a Pop-up Window to get it (because that would be cutting down on econ), and Viper is one of the meatiest pieces of ICE in this deck (STR 4 and two subs make it suitably annoying for Faust, and running two copies makes it annoying for Cyber-Cypher, eventually). If you wanted to fit it in, try it in place of the Archangel (that thing is really expensive in here). |
27 Jun 2016
MrHuds0n
Your games with this deck were probably some of the most funny games I've ever watched in Netrunner. Well done :) |
28 Jun 2016
Spoonfunk
I play a DRT variant that is really similar to this...its something that has been a work in progress for quite sometime. |
29 Jun 2016
PureFlight
When I saw the deck name, I fully expected to see a Student Loans in here. Ha! Take that, Exclusive Party! |
29 Jun 2016
thecodetroll
I know its going to be massively unlikely in competitive, but what the heck does this do vs NACH and / or decks with a lot of link (Nexus etc) |
29 Jun 2016
PeekaySK
I've played against NACH twice in the tournament, actually - those were the only games that were anywhere to close. The thing with NACH is that if you want to keep it around, it both slows down your agenda-stealing, and you have to keep a reasonable amount of credits. Also, remember that the thing keeping NACH around (namely Critic) stops Manhunt from being trashed... so every successful run costs them at least 2 credits extra. Overall, it's not that horrible. Needless to say, If you manage to SEA/EoI before they find their NACH, you're golden. Scoring a Datapool the old-fashioned way also works. |
2 Jul 2016
goodknite
I ran something very similar to this, I put a 15minutes in over 1 of the quantums and executive bootcamp to search up my Aryabhata Tech's. Also put 3 Troll's in as well because a trace they can't break is just too much fun. |
2 Jul 2016
esutter479
Really great design, Peekay! :) I love that the Dish is in here. I will undoubtedly be trying this deck out in my local store league. |
3 Jul 2016
eedok
This looks very similar to a deck I was playing online for a long time, were you a spectator when I played it against TheBigBoy like 3 or 4 times? |
4 Jul 2016
PeekaySK
Hooray, the progenitor surfaces! Editing you into the description for proper credit.
Also, footage from Brno's finals is now available to watch for anyone interested (also adding the link to the main deck description). |
4 Jul 2016
eedok
@PeekaySK No one saw it coming and it got 1st place, unfortunately the attendance of the GNK was like 1/3 what I was expecting |
4 Jul 2016
coyotemoon722
Thank you for helping me play core NBN again, one of my favorite IDs in the game! |
6 Jul 2016
Tirranek
It might sound like a silly reason, but the key thing about this deck that got my attention was a lack of AstroScript Pilot Programs. I've still not played all that much but I know how ubiquitous it is, so something that experiments with an alternate approach instantly gets my interest. I look forward to trying this out! |
6 Jul 2016
I_AM_G:\ROOT
I really like the ideas in this deck. |
7 Jul 2016
meta4
Cool deck I have a couple thoughts on it. First, how necessary do you think Midseason is in this deck? I noticed you didn't mention Midseason at all in your description. It seems to me that it might be overkill in tagging. You have 2 sea source to trigger EOI for Data Pool, and once you've done that you'll be able to tag the runner fairly easily if you have a credit advantage, assuming they have 0 or 1 link. If they have 2 link you might still be able to pull it off, but if they have more link than that you're probably going to lose the matchup regardless (midseason isn't going to help very much). At the very least, I could definitely see you go down to 1 midseason. In its place, a couple cards strike me as being useful, and the ones you choose to go with really depend on which matchup you think is worst. First of all, Interns seems great to recur your assets and ice against destruction decks. Keegan Lane is great against any runner you can land tags on with sea source and data pool. Furthermore, Keegan will allow more traces to trigger as you kill programs mid-run, thus triggering Aryabhata. If you decide to include Keegan I would also probably try to include at least one data raven for combos with Keegan. You mentioned closed accounts before, and I think it would be a great include as well. My main concern with a deck like this is a runner deck with 4+ link, but I'm not sure there anything you can do to salvage that matchup. If only net police was better... |
20 Jul 2016
menghoff
I've played a few games with this deck and it's the most fun I've had with a corp deck for a good while, so a big thanks for that! How would you make it compliant with the updated Most Wanted List? -1 Archived memories +1 Closesd accounts or -1 Caduceus +1 Something or something else? |
21 Jul 2016
PeekaySK
Hey, sorry it took me a while to get back to comments here. Let's dive right in!
With these phases in mind, consider the ICE pieces you mention:
As for it being overkill and needlessly duplicituous with SEA Source - SEA is here for when you need to trace them to do one thing (typically either trash Professional Contacts/a loaded Kati Jones, in order to get an upper hand in the econ war, or quickly grab a Restructured Datapool before they hit 7 points by accident)... and you need to trace them right now, because if you wait for a Midseasons trace you might not be able to out-money them, they may find their Film Critic by then, and so on. Midseasons are more conditional and potentially more expensive (because you have to play them when you have the opportunity, not necessarily when it's convenient for you), but have longer-lasting effects and fewer/different counterplay options. If you really wanted to lose the Midseasons, I'd definitely add either more ICE (Troll, Data Raven and possibly News Hound) would be my short-list) before adding things like Keegan Lane (whose usefulness scales with the number of ICE pieces and is useless if you can't land tags) or Interns (which would serve to make your primary plan more oppressive once it's working, but not necessarily help make it work). As for the Link 4+ situation: The amount of Link that is unsolvable takes a bunch of credits and time to set up (Manhunt with a Primary Transmission Dish out and the NBN: Making News credits is still a 3-credit tax each turn, even with Link 4), so it's one of those matchups where you should really be rushing. Also, high-link decks traditionally have a lot of expensive infrastructure which is resource-based (Data Folding, Underworld Contact and the like) - if you manage to pull off a Breaking News/trash kind of situation (whether with The All-Seeing I or old-school), that buys you a lot more time to keep rushing out stuff.
|
wow, using real 3-pointers and everything! Bold, sir.