Six Seamless BTL

Card draw simulator
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
Repartition by Cost
Repartition by Strength
Derived from
None. Self-made deck here.
Inspiration for
Built to Launch, RWR Startup
Include in your page (help)

nickolai 17

Deck that is meant to go very fast and rez Archers. This deck was originally 3 seamless and Archers but I was inspired by harmonbee's six seamless to pump those numbers.

I've been playing Netrunner for a few months, and this is the first deck I've built that I'm happy with. It is fun the play and feels incredible when its going good. This deck does have a very singular plan and is quite consistent (no 1x cards, more 3x than 2x). It has almost no flexibility in that plan 🙂

Favorite Lines

  • Installing a card in the remote and advancing it once - bluffing its a Charlotte. It's actually an Eminent you score next turn with a click left to install a Rashida.
  • Using Basalt counters to recur a Slash and Burn or Seamless to hand immediately after playing it.
  • Scoring an Eminent on top of a Tucana to install 2 pieces of ice.

Play Patterns

in my uneducated opinion 😎
  • You want every installed card in the remote to look like an 3 point agenda. Drag them through those Archers - you only need one of six Seamless to score out the "Basalt" you just IA.
  • The ideal scoring pattern is usually 1x Eminent (+1 forfeited for an archer if required) and 2x Basalt.
  • You almost never want to score a Slash and Burn unless it wins you the game. Slash and Burn can stagnate in your hand waiting for an agenda sometimes, so HQ is usually a juicier of a target for the runner - I usually ice HQ a bit more than I would otherwise anticipating this.
  • You can FA an Eminent if needed with Slash and Burn.
  • If you can't seem to find tempo pieces, using a Tree Line on a Pharos is a good pivot.
  • Extract is almost always used on Descent if you don't need to pull it to HQ.

Deckbuilding Considerations

  • I don't love Tucana - it can be really good tempo, but sometimes you just don't get it at the right time. Trojan Horse could be mean.
  • The influence of 1x Charlotte or Seamless could be distributed differently for tech cards, for example: -1 Charlotte, +1 Rashida, -2 Tucana, +1 Mavrius, +1 Magnet
5 comments
13 Sep 2024 Necrid

Hey! Thank you so much for the report, the deck looks really cool. Congratulations. What do you think about removing 3x Seamless for 2 La costa + Audacity? Maybe it can combo well with Charlotte and may also fit into that IA plan.

14 Sep 2024 nickolai

I do like that Seamless/Slash can't be interacted with unless with Burner, Cupellation or stealing them. I could see myself getting sad when they Pinhole the La Costa, but the value of getting that advancement turn after turn is enticing. I'll give it a go.

14 Sep 2024 asddqwddas

When I was considering how to enter the crypto exchange market, I found a fantastic resource that outlines the process of setting up a white-label solution. If you're in a similar position, the guide available at merehead.com provides detailed information and guidance. It’s incredibly helpful for understanding the steps involved and ensuring you make informed decisions along the way.

14 Sep 2024 harmonbee

Cool deck, and thanks for the shoutout! It's cool to see that the idea of simply putting more Seamlesses in a deck is taking off!

Have you considered doing something like -1 Eminent -1 Basalt +2 Atlas? This gives you a little more out for fast advancing the final points if needed, and you can easily get Atlas counters through all of the Seamlesses.

Also, have you considered the third Rashida in place of the second Extract? Extract seems to have significantly less value in this list than it does in Ob, but maybe you've found that you have spare cards to trash?

15 Sep 2024 nickolai

The 2x Atlas is a really good idea and you're probably right about Extract. Thanks for the ideas I'll give them a go 🫡