Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from | |||
---|---|---|---|
Talk Softly and Carry a Big Spoon | 0 | 1 | 7 |
Inspiration for |
---|
None yet |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
Step 1- Run R&D Step 2- Spoon Step 3- Repeat
9 comments |
---|
23 Nov 2015
staglore
|
23 Nov 2015
FarCryFromHuman
Yeah this is way scarier IMO. I also really like the use of Pipeline here! It's a wise influence saver and counters a major weakness of this archetype: stacked sentries. Honestly the only other thing I can think of without playing this is that Escher is super good for Kit and gives you some handy HQ pressure. One copy might be able to replace a Scavenge, the Net Celebrity or your second Plascrete Carapace. I'd also try to jiggle slots around to squeeze in the third Armitage Codebusting. |
23 Nov 2015
Bigguyforyou518
So I made a very similar version of this after our discussion and tested it for 4-5 games. Biggest changes I've made:
I'm still really digging the idea. I think both our decks suffer from slim econ, especially if you have to get your hands dirty with some asset trashing. |
24 Nov 2015
GrantZilla1979
I watched I'm liking this a heck of a lot better. And this may sound crazy, but Immolation Script could work here as well. Most people aren't going to worry about ICEing archives vs. this ID, and it could blow a scoring server wide open that they're holding you off from. Archangel and Will-o'-the-Wisp could give you some headaches, but with the recursion you're packing they'd only be temporary ones. |
24 Nov 2015
GrantZilla1979
BTW - This deck is going to be scary as hell during the Mumbad cycle once this gets Rebirthed into from Kate. |
24 Nov 2015
GrantZilla1979
Not too bad, I don't think. He's going to be blasting away the ICE in front of it to try to keep it a code gate. And if an Escher is worked in, he'll just shunt it to a server he doesn't care about accessing. |
25 Nov 2015
staglore
The more I look at this list the more I'm concerned about it's econ. Might need to work in a couple Dirty Laundrys
|
Thanks to @FarCryFromHuman and @Bigguyforyou518 for your suggestions.