All Data, All Destiny
| Legality (show more) |
|---|
| Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
| Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
| Rotation |
|---|
| Pre-rotation decklist |
| Packs |
|---|
| Data and Destiny |
| Card draw simulator |
|---|
|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
| Repartition by Cost |
|---|
| Repartition by Strength |
|---|
| Derived from |
|---|
| None. Self-made deck here. |
| Inspiration for | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| All Data, All Destiny v1.whatever | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Include in your page (help) |
|---|
LeonardQuirm 973
This deck has one purpose - to be a legal runner deck built out of just D&D cards. I hear that there aren't any decklists in the Data and Destiny insert, unlike in the previous big boxes. Turns out that the reason isn't because you can't build legal decks: here's one with Apex!
Regarding the other runners:
Sunny isn't possible. She can get to 48 cards with 24 influence used (and all 1-influence cards taken at max), but the 50 card limit for her deck stops it working.
Adam is technically possible using just Data and Destiny cards, although not using just one set of Data and Destiny! The only way you can get 45 cards is by including 3 copies of his directives in his deck, which means you need a fourth copy to start play with. Best reason for buying the pack twice?
Now...does anyone fancy trying to run this?
| 12 comments |
|---|
|
9 Sep 2015
Pinkwarrior
|
|
9 Sep 2015
Yziel
Apex can't play Technical Writer or Dr. Lovegood. On top of that you can't ever play Globalsec Security Clearance because you don't have enough link. And windfall is going to bet you like 1-2 credits most of the time making it useless. And Security is incredibly close to pointless with Endless Hunger as your only breaker and you can't use myltithreader on anything. I don't really see the point, sure you can build a deck using only D&D but over half your deck is dead draws 100% of the time that can only be used for his ability. I can't imagine ever playing anything like that. |
|
9 Sep 2015
PaxCecilia
Very surprised at the responses to this deck... he pretty clearly outlined the point: it's possible to make a legal D&D-only runner deck. One of my favourite things about this pile is that Windfall gives you a maximum of 3c. Glorious. |
|
9 Sep 2015
Treiclon
It's true you can't play all those cards. But I'm going to take on devil's attorney role and say that you can install those cards facedown anyway. But anyway |
|
9 Sep 2015
LeonardQuirm
Fair point actually, you could swap out 3* Dr. Lovegood and 3* Globalsec Security Clearance for 2* each of Sunny's breakers. Alternatively, we could upgrade 2 of the 1-influence cards for Security Nexus to give Windfall an opportunity to strike big! Oh wait, now we're back to terrible ideas again. |
|
9 Sep 2015
Sabin76
|
|
9 Sep 2015
Pinkwarrior
If you took out the 3x Globalsec Security Clearance for Safety First which would actually be useful since your installing all the time and you have the Heartbeat to counter the downside plus it'll use more influence up. |
|
9 Sep 2015
dr00
not sure why everyone's so worried about APEX' non-virtual resources. APEX can play every card in this deck.... facedown :P |
|
10 Sep 2015
RTsa
Even though people point out the Cerebral Static thing as a joke, it's actually surprisingly relevant. As Jinteki, you definitely DO play CS if you've included it in your deck and draw it against APEX. I've seen this happen twice (there's a stream by bewnt where he does this and I played it vs APEX once in an OCTGN game too) and it actually works quite well vs it. Losing the facedown installs ability early is a huge pain. It's probably still not worth it to include non-virtual resources in an APEX deck, at least not until CS is ubiquitous in the meta you play in. |
@LeonardQuirmYou know you can't actually use Dr. Lovegood / Technical Writer writer right?. Also Multithreader & Security Chip are pointless also making 15 of your influence pointless. Which I would say is probably why their aren't any decklists in D&D.