Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from |
---|
None. Self-made deck here. |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
Notoriety Quest | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
Can't score out of remotes? Score out of your own hand!
Early bird, doppelgang archives, legwork/maker's eye whichever is left, double notoriety! Or ya know, same old thing for 1 notoriety. Bonus points for Makers + legwork + doppelganger archives for 2 notoriety.
CCCCCCOMOBO DECKS.
17 comments |
---|
2 May 2014
CodeMarvelous
|
2 May 2014
x3r0h0ur
I think it's slightly less narrow, and has a pressure effect that bank job doesn't. I think both merit testing. This however has central only breakers so in this case, I kinda of have to use security testing :P |
2 May 2014
r
SOT can recur a trashed Notoriety (from Net Damage and such) and play it for its effect, but after a Notoriety has been added to the score area it cannot be touched by SOT. SOT expressly recurs events from the heap only. |
2 May 2014
x3r0h0ur
Yea I meant it uses it from the archives, like on a discard so you don't have to hold it all damn game till you need it. Looks like NRDB likes Tenma decks. I'm going to start posting all my iterations for +rep :) |
3 May 2014
mountebank
Would you bother clearing tags with this, provided that you have a Plascrete out? |
3 May 2014
Dydra
I've seen somewhere a bunch of breakdown on the efficiency on the new breakers and it isn't that great. I guess thematically they work perfect for this deck, but you might want a breaker swap if they don't prove that efficient :\ |
3 May 2014
emime
....otherwise what about adding a Quest Completed for the surprise remote access? |
3 May 2014
w1kk
Maybe change 1 breach for a corroder with those 2 influence. It could help to run remotes and its more efficient even on centrals |
3 May 2014
x3r0h0ur
Adding a chance for them to kill my corroder with a grim or archer? Nah. QC maybe, but I hate having to guess right. Theres lots of upgrades going around. I'd rather just have the makers |
3 May 2014
x3r0h0ur
Absolutely ensure you get them, and to fill the same role as savior, only install the one you need. Keeps the tempo and pressure up. |
5 May 2014
x3r0h0ur
True, but with early bird and doppelganger you shouldn't need it, I wouldn't spare the 2 influence per when theres so many good run events. |
9 May 2014
Fjord
Has this deck been tested or is it a concept? The economy scares me. If you don't have an easy server to get into for Security Contract you're down to just Armitage Codebusting. Even if you draw one that won't be enough to fuel your whole game. I would have thought Dirty Laundry would be an autoinclude for Tenma? I'm not seeing a strong substitute for Sure Gamble? Also you have 3 +1MU consoles, 2 SMC and a 3MU rig, seems to call for a Sneakdoor Beta or Magnum Opus. Your response to w1kk's suggestion to add a Corroder doesn't make sense to me. Adding a chance for them to kill my corroder with a grim or archer? Nah. How is Corroder any more vulnerable? I think Corroder would be a great add, most decks will just look at your rig and score like crazy on a remote while letting you pay 4 to break Wall of Static or an advanced Ice Wall. |
do you think security testing is better for tenma than bank job