Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
Packs |
---|
Core Set |
What Lies Ahead |
Humanity's Shadow |
Future Proof |
Creation and Control |
Opening Moves |
True Colors |
Honor and Profit |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from | |||
---|---|---|---|
Hard ICED Tea V1.0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
Bark at the Moon V1.3 | 5 | 5 | 14 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
Shut your opponent out with an absurd amount of ICE. Use Jackson Howard to draw like crazy and don't be afraid to dump Bioroid ICE into your archives. To win with a combo, put Whirpool in front of Howler and hit them with Janus when they least expect it (for instance, you can do this even if you only have one credit). If you really want to make your opponent cry, put Whirlpool and Howler in front of a Cell Portal.
Feedback is welcome, and feel free to check out either my previous version or the version suggested by Baotus.
2 comments |
---|
26 May 2014
Jashay
|
26 May 2014
Cancer Ace
It plays very glacier like. Slow, but indomitable. The sheer amount of ICE means NEXT Design almost always lets you start the game with three ICE on the battlefield. I have had some econ problems though, so I may play test a version running EtF. I could find interesting things to do with three more influence I think, too. |
What is the advantage of NEXT design over EtF for this deck? I personally found that if you aren't going to use the early ice for anything, you are better off going for the economic benefits of EtF. Both minelayer and howler can trigger that extra credit on the runner's turn, too, so the economic advantage can really stack up.
The deck looks like a fairly solid glacier, though. How does it play out?