Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Deck valid after Fourth Rotation |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
Repartition by Cost |
---|
Repartition by Strength |
---|
Derived from |
---|
None. Self-made deck here. |
Inspiration for | |||
---|---|---|---|
Relentless PD (1st at SSCG SC 6-0) | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Stoppable PD (2-2 GNK) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Another PD | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ludicrous SPD | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Worlds PD | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Include in your page (help) |
---|
Also went 3-1 at Linköping SC.
Big shoutout to rustryder from my test group Unband for this list, I only swapped out one FC3 for another magnet to make the ice a bit leaner overall and was happy with it after that.
Needless to say very similar lists have been played and posted before, in particular shoutout to Heinzel and RotomAppliance for their recent contributions to PD theory. And to testrunning for the original seamless rush list.
Not much to say that hasnt already been said, but some notable thoughts:
Possibly the bran should be a cheaper ice to once again make the ice suite a bit leaner, but not totally sure.
Thanks to Ghost00 for a nice and well run event!
8 comments |
---|
24 May 2021
Jai
|
25 May 2021
tzeentchling
I'm curious as to what part of this do you think could get hit by MWL? The only thing I can really think of is Seamless Launch in terms of something that wouldn't affect multiple other decks in the format and/or HB as a whole. |
25 May 2021
Bridgeman
Hey! I agree that seemless launch would be the most natural candidate in that case. It mainly hits this ID. One could argue the defensive upgrades are a problem too but I´d say those getting hit is less likely. |
30 May 2021
dvdvcdcd1
I don't think it would get hit by MWL. The only raw draw power is Rashida Jaheem. Maybe Rashida Jaheem (for same reason to Voilet level clearence) gets banned in Next MWL. |
how do I dislike a deck