Legality (show more) |
---|
Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
Rotation |
---|
Pre-rotation decklist |
This is not meant as a serious deck for any kind of competetive play.
This is more of a theoretical approach towards the following questions:
Can you make a viable deck out of two of the mini factions?
I see a lot of decks here where all influence points are spent for cards of the same faction. Shapers with 15 inf in anarch cards, anarchs with 15 inf in criminal cards and so on. But would Data&Destiny allow a reasonable deck with one mini faction spending 25 inf on another one? Probably not. I found no way to make this look halfway acceptable using more than 20 inf on adam. And somehow I had the urge to add at least something that can potentially break non-ETR-subs.
I'd love to see a deck made from only neutral or mini-faction cards. So, come on, prove me wrong!
Can you put the three directives to good use?
As I see it, people don't include them at all. Not even in Adam decks! Well, at least not more than the standard 1-ofs that are not considered part of Adams deck. And I can't blame them. When I first saw the directives I thought "Wow. What a heavy disadvantage for an ID, having to start the game with this.". But what if I was wrong and these cards are not a burden? So I searched for decklists on NetrunnerDB containing directives. I found mostly Adam decks (of course), a few Apex decks with one directive or the other and a single non-D&D ID with a directive: Always Be Scoring. A nice approach to combine Always Be Running with criminal tools and an ID that tends to always be running anyways: Ken.
I'd like to see more of that. What directives do you use for Apex? Or for any other runner than Adam?
This is more of a card review than a deck description, but this deck's purpose is to see if you can make use of these cards outside of Adam, so I guess this somehow belongs here. Plus, reviews aren't enabled yet for D&D cards.
0 comments |
---|